PANEL GAG BONDAGE FREE

PANEL GAG BONDAGE FREE

Any attempts to appeal the situation to the courts had been unsuccessful, the law made it near impossible to free someone deemed a danger to society and there was no appeals process to get a second opinion.Īll this seemed incredibly suspicious to Carol. Any communication or visitation was out of the question they were told as it would ‘interfere with treatment’. In basically all cases families were told their relative was a long term case and would likely be institutionalized for the foreseeable future, possibly forever. One was told their daughter was a violent paranoid schizophrenic, another was told their daughter was an undiagnosed psychopath with sadistic violent tendencies. When they had called authorities and gotten lawyers they all ran into similar dead ends with various severe diagnosis being given as the justification. The per capita rate of institutionalization was considerably higher than the national average, even more oddly, 20 and 30 something women seemed to be the most common demographic affected as opposed to nationally where men were much more likely to be affected.Ĭarol had interviewed some of the families who were shocked as their relatives had never shown any signs of psychological difficulties.

What had piqued Carol’s interest though were the statistics in her local city. Institutionalization was fairly rare and mass violence had dropped greatly. In general nationwide the law was quite popular and seemed to be working out quite well. Mild cases were supposed to be referred on for outpatient care whereas cases of imminent danger to society were to be institutionalized for treatment. Risk came in multiple levels, from mild to imminent danger to society. If police received reports someone was violent or dangerous, they had the legal authority and obligation to arrest them and hold them in custody until a psychologist could analyze them to determine if they were a risk. About a year ago in response to the acts of mass violence increasingly occurring, the federal government had loosened the protections against unwillingly institutionalizing people.

She was currently working on a story looking into the new institutionalization laws.

She was only five years into her career, having graduated college and gotten a job at the local paper and overall despite the obvious negatives she did enjoy her career. She had always enjoyed doing the Nancy Drew routine and being a reporter gave her a bit more free reign to investigate without being tied down by procedure or red tape. Some readers may find some elements of this story offensive, reader discretion is advised.Ĭarol was an investigative reporter, on some days she second guessed her choice to pursue journalism, after all the job security was nonexistent, the pay was mediocre, and the hours were less than great but overall she loved it. Do not attempt to replicate any aspect of this story as the bondage is not safe. If you ever find yourself tempted to do something non-consensual PLEASE get yourself mental help. All real world bondage should ALWAYS be consensual and done in a safe way. WARNING: The following story contains non-consensual scenarios and is intended for adults only.

Panel gag bondage